Feb 12 2009

New Leader in the “Busy Mac” Competition

Must’ve been busy enough…

Can you name all the apps?

Can you name all the apps?

http://cultofmac.com/the-new-leader-in-the-busy-mac-contest/7909


Feb 5 2009

Colgate, anyone?

A NewScientist reader points out that their tube of colgate reads, “Clinically proven everyday protection against time…”

Hm…


Feb 3 2009

Security concerns?

Recently, Google had been taken down by ‘human error’. While some thought that Google was taken down by crackers, the statement released says that it was caused by an employee accidentally typing “/” into the malicious sites list. “/”, of course, expands to include every website, so any search would lead you to a “This site may harm your computer” message.

While Google solves their problems, Mac OS X, with it’s new 10% market share, gets it’s first malicious trojan. iServices.a came to the attention to the technological community through Intego which reports that copies of iWork ‘09 pirated through bittorrent
like this one contains a trojan that “is installed as a startup item (in /System/Library/StartupItems/iWorkServices, a location reserved normally for Apple startup items), where it has read-write-execute permissions for root. The malicious software connects to a remote server over the Internet; this means that a malicious user will be alerted that this Trojan horse is installed on different Macs, and will have the ability to connect to them and perform various actions remotely. The Trojan horse may also download additional components to an infected Mac.”

It’s x86 disassembly code can be found here. (Alternate download site)

A variation of this virus was also found in pirated copies of Adobe Photoshop CS4. This version is called iServices.b.
…Looks like it’s time for you to get Mac antiviral/security software; it’s coming.


Feb 3 2009

Why I.E.?

While B Hung points out Google’s downtime, I noticed something else in his post. The screenshot shows him using IE

That’s my pet peeve. IE.

It has been too long. Microsoft’s strategy of “creative inertia” regarding IE seems to be proving himself. Even people as technologically literate as B. Hung should know better (nothing against him, though). I find this unbearable; while I have no control over what people use, IE or otherwise, Microsoft’s Internet Explorer is a bad choice.

Why not?

  1. Standards. IE is infamous in terms of upholding open, industry-wide standards. Microsoft, working as hard as they might be, are not doing a great enough job to implement these standards. Web-developers have had a hard time, because they have to write two versions of every page; an IE-compatible one and a standards-compliant one. This time could be well spent to improve and streamline their pages; in the meantime, this means that the websites that you use would not improve.
  2. Security. It’s appalling. IE’s famed security concerns. There is so much to say that I should just summarize them in these links: Link 1, Link 2. IE’s shady history should tell you all you need to know to make you change.
  3. Don’t support Microsoft’s actions. What Microsoft has done with Netscape is unforgivable. What they did with implementing ActiveX is even more so unforgivable. Don’t support their actions by using IE. Please.

Reasons why people use it:

  1. Inertia. They didn’t bother to change. This applies to the 72% of online users who still stubbornly use this browser.

Your options:

(Just before you list browsers like Maxthon here, might I just say that browsers using the Trident layout engine should not be listed here. The trident engine is basically IE’s layout engine, so they basically share similar standards compatibility)

  1. Mozilla Firefox — Free, open source browser. Uses a mostly-standards compliant engine (Gecko). Available for OS X, XP/Vista, and most Linux distributions.
  2. Google Chrome — Free, open source browser. Uses one of the best engines out there (Webkit). Windows XP / Vista only.
  3. Safari — Free, closed source browser. Uses the same layout engine as Chrome. Default bundled browser on Mac OS X, available for Windows XP / Vista.
  4. Opera — Free, closed source browser. Uses a different engine (Presto) that is more compliant than Gecko but less so than Webkit. Available for OS X, XP/Vista, and several Linux distributions.
  5. Flock (Just a Firefox ripoff.) — Firefox with another skin and plugin.
  6. Camino — Lightweight Gecko- based browser

So. Please. Not IE.

(For more reading, click here)


Feb 3 2009

WordPress

Why WordPress?

WordPress is simple, easy, and most importantly, free. I used to use Drupal, but Drupal proved to be too confusing—administration is a challenge, and setting things, especially languages, is simply too complicated, and repetitive.

And finally, WordPress itself is open source. (the WordPress CMS, that is.)

PS. I need a nicer theme… and of course I’m open to suggestions..

PPS. Please can we just get extensions in WP.com?


Feb 3 2009

B Hung

Just as I am trying out WordPress, might I remark what I think of Mr. Hung, through this video:

http://www.facebook.com/v/49787606570

(You just gotta love Paul’s opening…)

And just as I posted the video on Facebook, our results for the math exam came out; I really, seriously feel sorry for Hung—he really taught well but some of us got bad results nonetheless…

His blog post