
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wikinerd&#039;z &#187; Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wikinerd.net/tag/windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wikinerd.net</link>
	<description>Complexity for a simple mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why I.E.?</title>
		<link>http://wikinerd.net/2009/02/why-ie/</link>
		<comments>http://wikinerd.net/2009/02/why-ie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wikinerd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wikinerd.wordpress.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While B Hung points out Google&#8217;s downtime, I noticed something else in his post. The screenshot shows him using IE
That&#8217;s my pet peeve. IE.
It has been too long. Microsoft&#8217;s strategy of &#8220;creative inertia&#8221; regarding IE seems to be proving himself. Even people as technologically literate as B. Hung should know better (nothing against him, though). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While B Hung <a href="http://benedict-hung.blogspot.com/2009/01/is-google-down.html">points out Google&#8217;s downtime</a>, I noticed something else in his post. The <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jrNsUVfdNBE/SYRqqKvxI3I/AAAAAAAAAnA/b-PQunk1g-o/s1600-h/google.jpg" target="_blank">screenshot</a> shows him using IE</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my pet peeve. IE.</p>
<p>It has been too long. Microsoft&#8217;s strategy of &#8220;creative inertia&#8221; regarding IE seems to be proving himself. Even people as technologically literate as B. Hung should know better (nothing against him, though). I find this unbearable; while I have no control over what people use, IE or otherwise, Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer is a bad choice.</p>
<p>Why not?</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Standards.</strong> IE is infamous in terms of upholding open, industry-wide standards. Microsoft, working as hard as they might be, are not doing a great enough job to implement these standards. Web-developers have had a hard time, because they have to write two versions of every page; an IE-compatible one and a standards-compliant one. This time could be well spent to improve and streamline their pages; in the meantime, this means that the websites that you use would not improve.</li>
<li><strong>Security.</strong> It&#8217;s appalling. IE&#8217;s famed security concerns. There is so much to say that I should just summarize them in these links: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer#Security_vulnerabilities" target="_blank">Link 1</a>, <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=IE+security" target="_blank">Link 2</a>. IE&#8217;s shady history should tell you all you need to know to make you change.</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t support Microsoft&#8217;s actions.</strong> What Microsoft has done with Netscape is unforgivable. What they did with implementing ActiveX is even more so unforgivable. Don&#8217;t support their actions by using IE. Please.</li>
</ol>
<p>Reason<span style="text-decoration:line-through;">s</span> why people use it:</p>
<ol>
<li>Inertia. They didn&#8217;t bother to change. This applies to the 72% of online users who still stubbornly use this browser.</li>
</ol>
<p>Your options:</p>
<p>(Just before you list browsers like Maxthon here, might I just say that browsers using the Trident layout engine should not be listed here. The trident engine is basically IE&#8217;s layout engine, so they basically share similar standards compatibility)</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a> — Free, open source browser. Uses a mostly-standards compliant engine (Gecko). Available for OS X, XP/Vista, and most Linux distributions.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a> — Free, open source browser. Uses one of the best engines out there (Webkit). Windows XP / Vista only.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" target="_blank">Safari</a> — Free, closed source browser. Uses the same layout engine as Chrome. Default bundled browser on Mac OS X, available for Windows XP / Vista.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a> — Free, closed source browser. Uses a different engine (Presto) that is more compliant than Gecko but less so than Webkit. Available for OS X, XP/Vista, and several Linux distributions.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.flock.com/">Flock </a>(Just a Firefox ripoff.) — Firefox with another skin and plugin.</li>
<li><a href="http://Caminobrowser.org" target="_blank">Camino</a> — Lightweight Gecko- based browser</li>
</ol>
<p>So. Please. Not IE.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.lockergnome.com/news/2004/06/15/why-you-should-dump-internet-explorer/" target="_blank">For more reading, click here</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wikinerd.net/2009/02/why-ie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
